DAT-heads Digest #398

Contents:

looking for jim carroll shows (CjC) Re: emphasis (Tom McCreadie) Re: Pre-emphasis ("Gary Davis") Maxell DVD-R's 35 cents Office Depot ("Gary Davis") dat tapes (Stephen Stroud)
From: CjC <catch_the_dyin_sun@yahoo.com> Subject: looking for jim carroll shows Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 10:49:03 -0800 (PST) anyone have these? 2/12/05 middle east, cambridge Joe's Pub (New York, NY) 24 August 2003 Howl Festival: "Rock Poets" benefit for FEVA with Lou Reed, Thurston Moore, Lee Ranaldo, Ed Sanders, and Karen Finley. Carroll also made a surprise guest appearance with Lenny Kaye's band a night or two earlier. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
From: Tom McCreadie <mccreadi@xs4all.nl> Subject: Re: emphasis Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:24:03 +0100 Bob in #397: >If you playback on a DAT deck that supports emphasis (I believe all of >them do, by the way) the digital output will have valid digital audio >data, and that digital data will have the preemphasis flag set. >When you route this into a computer, via whatever means, the resulting >WAV files which are created cannot store the fact that the data needs >preemphasis. There is no preemphasis flag in the WAV format. I am >not aware of any common digital audio format for computers which has >the ability to store the preemphasis flag. Agreed. Interestingly, though, some RME soundcards at least have a handy capability to detect or set emphasis bits: the incoming emphasized digital signal from a DAT is recorded as a H/D wav file with its emphasis skewing unchanged, but the analog monitor-signal does get automatically de-emphasized, so that you listen to the correct frequency response. This frequency-skewed wav file now on the H/D contains, of course, no data to reveal its preamphasized condition, but if you now manually check an emphasis setting in the RME soundcard software, you ensure a correct analog monitor signal during all editing/mastering work - and the flags do get reinserted if you export your wav as a digital stream back to an external DAT, stand-alone cd recorder etc. >Now, if you are suggesting that someone could use the *analog* outputs >from a DAT deck that supports preemphasis, yes, this would work, but >you are introducing a whole bunch of extra noise and hassle in the >process going from digital > analog > digital just to remove the >preemphasis. It is especially problematic to get the analog input >into a computer without introducing all sorts of RF noise. Marc was already wrestling with one crapped-out audio channel, so it's unrealistic for him to pursue ultimate fidelity on this project. [In cases, though, of being shackled with a soundcard with poor A-D, a workaround is to borrow a 2nd DAT recorder and run: DAT1(tape play) DA > AD DAT2(record mode, no tape) > s/pdif DD > PC.] Having had the chore of needing to fix the preemphasis on close to 130 concert tapes, I've had plenty of chance to dabble with all three suggested techniques (and a even a 4th - analog domain deemphasis filter in audio preamp tape monitor loop) This had all started when a friend helped me out with transfer to H/D thence CD of my Aladdin's cave <g> of vcr/Sony PCM 501 tapes (all with preemphasis) from the 1980's and early 1990's. Alas, he chose to transfer digitally to pc via his new Sony PCM 601...and the rest is history <g>. The majority of the rework jobs were done by digital equalization of the H/D wav file using the Waves software plugin - Waves Q 10 Paragraphic preset "DAT-CD de/pre-emphasis". In honesty, on loudspeaker playback I could hardly distinguish between the 'end product' of the three approaches (cd flags; digital wav equalization; PCM501 > A>D > soundcard). The Waves plugin got the nod then for speed and convenience...ironically, I later got round to testing its response and was dismayed to find it's shape differing a fair amount from the theoretical emphasis curve. Tom 'Music is the greatest silent force in the world' - Lionel Richie
From: "Gary Davis" <g@hoxnet.com> Subject: Re: Pre-emphasis Reply-to: g@hoxnet.com Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:48:01 -0800 I think the suggestion was to play it back analog, then record it analog on another DAT deck or CD recorder, and then transfer it to the computer. Doing an analog transfer between two studio-quality digital recorders does NOT significantly hurt the quality, and can be useful for any number of reasons (mono'ing one channel to both, EQ, volume adjustment, etc). --Gary
From: "Gary Davis" <g@hoxnet.com> Subject: Maxell DVD-R's 35 cents Office Depot Reply-to: g@hoxnet.com Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 17:17:38 -0800 In 50-packs, $34.99 each, buy one get one free. Check the label for "Made in Japan." --Gary
From: Stephen Stroud <stroud@sympatico.ca> Subject: dat tapes Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:26:23 -0500 hello there, i'm new to dat, just bought a d8 and i'm wondering about what tapes i should use, or better yet what tapes should i avoid using, i know when i started trading audio tapes maxell was "the" tape to use but i know their cdrs arn't very good, what about their dat tapes? anyone that can point me in the right direction would be a great help, also i live in canada near toronto, if you know a good place around there to buy tapes that would be great, or am i better off ordering them online? anyway thanks
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** To unsubscribe from this digest, please send email to dat-heads-unsubscribe@datheads.phish.net If your email address has changed, you may (optionally) send the message to dat-heads-unsubscribe-oldaddress=olddomain@datheads.phish.net and the old address will be removed. Problems or questions about a subscription should be addressed via these avenues and then if needed to dat-heads-owner@datheads.phish.net or postmaster@datheads.phish.net never the list itself You can submit a message for inclusion in the next digest via this address: Internet: dat-heads@datheads.phish.net Archives of DAT-Heads digests and related files are available on the DAT-Heads home page: http://www.solorb.com/dat-heads/ End of DAT-Heads Digest ******************************